SPECIAL COLLECTIONS RESEARCH CENTER
A Treatise on Engineering Field-Work by Peter Bruff. 1838
[Front Free Fly Leaf]
[Half Title]
A TREATISE
ON
ENGINEERING FIELD-WORK.
[Title Page]
A TREATISE
ON
ENGINEERING FIELD-WORK:
CONTAINING
PRACTICAL LAND SURVEYING FOR
RAILWAYS, &c.
WITH THE THEORY, PRINCIPLES, AND
PRACTICE OF LEVELLING,
AND THEIR
APPLICATION TO THE PURPOSES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING.
ALSO
PARISH AND SUBTERRANEAN SURVEYING,
WITH SECTIO-PLANOGRAPHY,
AND
EVERY INFORMATION NECESSARY TO BE KNOWN IN THE
ELEMENTARY PARTS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING;
WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF THE BEST INSTRUMENTS EMPLOYED IN SURVEYING AND
LEVELLING, THEIR ADJUSTMENTS AND METHODS OF USING IN THE FIELD.
Illustrated by numerous Plates and Diagrams.
BY
PETER BRUFF,
SURVEYOR. &c. LONDON:
SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, & CO., STATIONERS' HALL COURT
SOLD BY
HEBERT, CHEAPSIDE; TAYLOR, WELLINGTON STREET, STRAND; WEALE HIGH
HOLBORN; AND WILLIAMS, GREAT RUSSELL STREET, BLOOMSBURY
1838.
[Printer's Imprint]

Imprinted by EDWARD RAVENSCROFT of London,
18, Tooks Court, Chancery Lane.
Udført af hærens bogbestand
den 19/7 1995
Det Kgl. Garnisonsbibliotek
Bibliotekar
[Preface]
PREFACE
THE idea of writing this Treatise suggested itself
to me a considerable time since, from knowing
the repeated inquiries that had been made for such
a book; and after perusing, I believe, every work
that has been published on the subject, I was fully
convinced of the necessity of such a work, adapted
to the present improved practice. Of the works
on Surveying, I may say, they are all elementary,
and of ante-date, no treatise, that I am aware of,
having been published since the fine mathematical
instruments at present in use have been considered
a necessary adjunct to the successful prosecution of
land surveying. Of the treatises published on
levelling, there is only one of recent date, by Mr.
Sims, that can be referred to, and I consider that
does not supply the wants of persons seeking in-
formation on the subject.
The few rules and suggestions that I have
thrown in at the end of the volume, I hope will be
found of service.
[page vi]
Many facts and suggestions that I wished to
embody in these pages, I have been compelled to
omit, from not having time to put them in an
intelligible shape. I have transcribed but little
from other works, although, where the subjects
are the same, there is necessarily a similarity.
In the Theory of Levelling, I have extracted
portions from Playfair's Philosophy, and Hutton
and Barlow's Philosophical Dictionaries; the article
on Refraction, from Robson's Marine Surveying;
some facts connected with the tides, from the En-
cyclopædia Britannica; a portion of Subterranean
Surveying, from Fenning's work on that subject.
I have also carefully looked over Mr. Sims's work
on Levelling, and his Treatise on Mathematical
Instruments, to which the reader, requiring more
detailed accounts of, is referred.
The method of laying out Curves is adapted
from the Railway Magazine, to which publication
I feel indebted. I would have added further exam-
ples in Surveying, but for want of time, am unable
to prepare them for the press.
P.B.
22, Charlotte Street, Bloomsbury,
April, 1838.
[Table of Contents]
|
CONTENTS.
|
|
SURVEYING.
|
|
Page |
| Introduction |
1 |
| General Observations and Rules to be observed |
3 |
| Method of taking Offsets |
9 |
To Survey a Single Field with the Chain only, and method of Plotting
the same |
9 |
To Survey a Single Field without a Diagonal, by means of Chain Angles,
and method of Plotting ditto |
13 |
| To Survey a Field with the Theodolite or Sextant |
15 |
| To Survey a Road with the Chain only |
16 |
| To Survey a Coppice of Wood with the Chain only |
17 |
| To take any inaccessible distances with the Chain only |
19 |
To Measure over a Steep Hill with the Chain, so as to reduce it to Hori-
zontal Measurement |
20 |
Example in Surveying, with different methods of keeping the Field-book,
(Plates 1, 2, and 5) |
21 |
| Example in Railway Surveying with Field-book, (Plates 3, 4, and 7) |
24 |
| Of Parish Surveying |
31 |
| Practical Directions for ditto |
37 |
| Method of Keeping a Base Line straight |
39 |
Method of Passing Obstructions, as Buildings, Woods, &c., without
breaking your line, and continuing it onward without interrup-
tion |
39 |
On Subterranean Surveying, with the methods adopted in Surveying
Colliery and other Subterranean Works |
46 |
| On the Protracting and Plotting of Surveys |
50 |
| On the Reducing of Figures, and Equalizing of Boundaries |
53 |
| On the method of Computing Areas |
57 |
|
SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS
|
| The Chain and Offsett Staff |
63 |
| Of the Circumferenter, and method of Observing with it |
65 |
| Of the Prismatic Compass, and ditto |
67 |
| Of the Pocket Sextant, its adjustments and use |
70 |
| Of the Theodolite, its adjustments and use |
72 |
| Method of Observing with the Theodolite |
75 |
Theodolite Improved by Captain Everest, description of, its adjustments,
and use |
78 |
| Instrumental Parallax |
81 |
| Cross-hairs of the Diaphragm |
81 |
| Theodolite Stand |
81 |
|
THEORY OF LEVELLING.
|
| The Figure of the Earth, with the Theory and Principles of Levelling |
83 |
| Method of Correcting for Curvature |
85 |
| Ditto for Refraction |
87 |
| Of the Causes which produce Atmospherical Refraction |
88 |
| Formula for Computing the Correction for Curvature |
91 |
[page ]
|
CONTENTS.
|
|
PRACTICE OF LEVELLING
|
|
Page |
| Example in Levelling |
94 |
| Field-book for ditto and Reduction of Levels |
97 |
| Plotted Section of ditto |
98 |
| Scales (different) used in Plotting a Section |
98 |
Example in Levelling for a Contract Section (Plate 7) with the Field-
book, and explanation of ditto |
99 |
Curvature, Correction for, not applied in Practice; with the method
adopted in Levelling Operations, whereby the Correction be-
comes unnecessary |
103 |
| Bench Marks, explanation and use of |
104 |
| Trial Sections, directions for taking |
107 |
| On the Assuming of a Datum Line |
107 |
Example of Trial Sections, (Plate 8) with directions for Plotting ditto for
the purposes of Comparison |
108 |
| Observations to be made on taking Trial Sections |
110 |
| Check Levels, explanation of, with directions for taking |
110 |
| Field-book for Check Levels |
112 |
| Example in Levelling with Cross Sections (Plate 8) |
113 |
| On Chaining, and overcoming difficulties that occur in Levelling |
115 |
| Levelling with the Theodolite |
118 |
| Formula for calculating the differences of Level |
120 |
| Field-book for Levelling with the Theodolite, with an example, (Plate 8) |
122 |
| On the method of taking Cross Sections with the Theodolite |
124 |
Sectio-Planography, or New Method of laying down Railway and other
Sections (Plate 8) |
126 |
On the Choosing of a Datum Line, the differences of level of high water
at various places, and how to obtain the mean level of the Sea |
128 |
|
LEVELLING INSTRUMENTS.
|
| Observations on Levelling Instruments |
131 |
| The Y Level, description of, its adjustments, and use |
132 |
| Troughton's Improved Level, ditto |
135 |
| Improved Dumpy Level, by Mr. Gravatt, ditto |
137 |
| On Instrumental Parallax, the cause of, and remedy |
141 |
| Of the Diaphragm, and bow to repair the Cross-Wires when broken |
143 |
| Levelling Staves |
143 |
| The Vane-Staff |
143 |
| The Sliding Staff |
144 |
| Improved Staff by Mr. Gravatt |
144 |
| Ditto, by the Author |
144 |
|
Observations on the Formation of Railways.
|
| On the Setting out of Railways |
148 |
| Method of Laying out Curves |
150 |
| Manner of Putting in the Widths |
154 |
Of Gradients, or Rates of Clivity, showing the method pursued in forming
an Embankment, or cutting to any rate of clivity, &c. |
154 |
| The Forming of Slopes |
156 |
| The Method of Calculating Earth-work |
157 |
| Tables of Slopes, Inclines, Curvature, &c |
157-8 |
| ADDENDA |
161 |
[B]
THE
PRACTICE OF SURVEYING.
SURVEYING in a general sense, denotes the art of
measuring the angular and linear distances of objects,
so as to be able to delineate their several positions
on paper, and to ascertain the superficial area, or
space between them. It is a branch of applied ma-
thematics, and supposes a good knowledge of arith-
metic and geometry. In the erection of extensive
buildings; the forming of new roads, or altering of
old ones; in the sale or purchase of property; or, in
fact, in any alteration of, or change in, landed pro-
perty, a survey is required.
It is most essential that the survey when made
should not only contain the correct area, but also
that every part should occupy its proper and true
position, otherwise serious evils will result. The
importance then of a survey being admitted, it
becomes the student's duty to make inquiry for
the most accurate method. It is admitted, when a
survey is made with the chain only, that numerous
[page 2]
lines are measured only for the purpose of fixing
points by which to determine the positions of the
objects to be delineated. Now by the use of angular
instruments these points are determined at once, and
far more correctly, without scarcely any other lines
being measured than are used in the detail of the
work; thus time is saved by the use of the instrument.
Many people object to the use of angular instruments
in a survey, alleging that far more correct results
may be obtained with the chain only, which is a
complete delusion--position, not distances, being
determined by the instrument (at least in land
surveying); and where the angles of a trapezium or
triangle, into which all figures should be resolved,
are taken with a good instrument, and the sides of
these figures accurately measured--we say, when
the work thus taken is laid down on paper, if the
measured distances of the lines coincide with those
protracted on paper, the position of such lines must
be correct, consequently such points, as it was the
object to delineate by means of the lines, must also
occupy their true position. It will be our object,
in the following pages, to direct the student how to
accomplish his object in the best manner, under a
variety of circumstances.
[B2]
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS,
WITH DIRECTIONS TO BE OBSERVED ON COMMENCING
A SURVEY.
SURVEYING may be performed in various ways with
the chain only, or by means of angular instruments
with the chain. In the first place, it should be
observed, that the base or principal line of a survey,
from which all the other lines diverge, should,
if practicable, be carried through the greatest extent
of property to be surveyed, so as to intersect the
principal or most intricate parts of the work; it is
also as well to carry your base line near midway
through the property, so as to leave nearly the same
quantity of work on the one side the base, as on the
other. Then your tye-lines in filling in, crossing
your base, and tying into the opposite line, will be
a satisfactory test of the accuracy of the work, and
will ensure the exact positions of the different objects
to be delineated in the survey. Chain surveying is
much more limited in its capabilities than survey-
ing with an instrument, and certainly not so
correct. In surveying with a chain you are, in
every case, limited to one figure, a triangle; and
the correctness of the survey, and relative position
of all objects to be delineated, entirely depend on
[page 4]
the extreme accuracy with which the sides of this
figure are respectively measured. Precipitous or
enclosed ground with strong fences, render it almost
impossible to measure the distances with that de-
gree of accuracy requisite; an error of only a few
links in the side of a triangle, only determined
by admeasurement, is not confined to that side on
which the error is made, but extends to the whole
figure; altering the position of every object enclosed
within it. Not so, if the positions of these sides
are determined with a theodolite, or other angular
instrument; for, in any case, if the angles are cor-
rectly taken, the sides will be placed in their true
position, and the admeasurement with the chain of
these sides will determine the correctness of the
angles, so that the angles and measurement are
mutually checks on each other. Too much care
cannot be bestowed on the measurement of a base
line, for on the correctness of a fundamental base,
every part of the survey depends--whether trigono-
metrical, or plain surveying with the theodolite and
chain, or chain only. Another important point to
be attended to is, always previous to commencing a
survey to accurately measure your chain. To do
this, tighten it on a level piece of ground, and with
a ten foot rod (correctly marked off from a two foot
carpenter's rule, or a plotting scale) carefully mea-
sure the chain, and, if in error, you must remove a
few rings, or shorten some of the links, observing
that you correct the error equally on each side the
[page 5]
mark denoting 50 links; if the error be consider-
able, you must distribute it equally, as near as
possible, over the ten divisions of the, chain; but
if only half a link or so, you might shorten the
first link from each end of the chain; the centre
division will then always be in the right place,
and the other divisions will be so triflingly in
error, as not to be worthy of notice. It is not the
error existing in one chain's length that is so dan-
gerous, but that error occasionally increasing; as for
instance, suppose a chain to have expanded only
one inch in its length, and you measure a base line
of three miles through a parish or estate, the error
in the length would be 20 feet, which would make
a great diminution in the quantity of land surveyed.
We cannot impress too earnestly on the surveyor's
mind the absolute necessity of attending to this
last instruction, and never, in any instance, to com-
mence a survey without previously testing his chain,
as it is generally, we may almost say universally,
neglected; surveyors being satisfied that their chains
were correct when they purchased them (but which
is not always the case), and that they will continue
so, or perhaps trying them two or three times in a
year. To show the necessity of attending to this
point, in a recent survey in which the Author was
engaged, there was also employed an eminent local
surveyor: at the conclusion of the survey, our
separate portions would not connect, indeed it was
very apparent on inspecting the plans that a serious
[page 6]
error existed; our chains were immediately measured,
when the local surveyor's was found to be nearly
2 feet longer than it ought to have been, immedi-
ately showing where the error existed. When the
surveyor is: quite satisfied that his chain is correct, he
should set off its length upon some convenient spot,
and mark the extremes in such a manner as to
preserve the means of daily comparing it while in
use; thus the slightest elongation would be imme-
diately detected, and easily rectified. While speaking
of chains, it would not here be amiss to recommend
a 100 foot chain, or a 132 foot chain, divided into
double links, in every case, in preference to Gunter's
chain of 66 feet; as you can measure a line with
much greater accuracy with a long chain than a
short one, for the same reason that you can measure
a line on paper more correct with a long scale than
a short one; viz., that you have not so many lengths
to measure off, each repetition producing an error,
which, although small in itself, when multiplied
by a large number produces a very sensible quan-
tity; which any one might prove by measuring off
a few lengths of a short scale on paper, and after-
wards applying thereto a much longer one. Also
in measuring over a wall or thick hedge, through
which you cannot pass the chain, the angle
formed with the long chain would be more obtuse,
and approach nearer to a horizontal line than if
a short one was used; as in the latter case you
would lose several links, the angle formed with
[page 7]
the horizon being greater than the former, and if
you allow for it by bringing the chain a few links
forward, it would be at random, and consequently,
very uncertain. Rapidity in plotting is also another
advantage attached to the use of the foot or double-
link chain, and a great saving of time in reading off
the distances in the field, although, for computing
the quantities, you must still come back to the
chain scale of 66 feet for convenience in reducing
to acres. Though it is generally held bad to plot
with one scale, and calculate the contents with
another, yet we are convinced that much more
accurate results would be arrived at if adopted;
always observing, that the scales you plot and cal-
culate with are both of the same material, either
box or ivory, although we would recommend box,
as being less liable to be acted on by changes in the
atmosphere.--(See article on the Chain.) A custom
is also very general, among some country surveyors,
of only using nine pins or arrows instead of ten,
making a huge mark or hole in the ground in
place of the tenth; a custom which cannot be too
much condemned, as being incompatible with cor-
rect admeasurement; as, in the next chain forward,
in place of holding to a pin, you hold over a large
hole, generally a link or two broad, which, on a line
of any great extent, would introduce large errors.
All lines measured over steep ground must be
reduced to the horizontal measurement, otherwise
the work will not plot, and there will appear a
greater quantity of land than there really is: this
[page 8]
must always be attended to. Generally where
hedge and ditch divides property, the brow of the
ditch is the boundary; hence the advantage of
the surveyor passing his lines along the ditch side
of fences. But the brow of the ditch is not always
the boundary, it being in some districts the roots
of the quicks, or the foot of the bank; therefore the
necessity of making inquiries as to local custom:
the width taken for a ditch that is partly filled, is
generally about 6 links, and for the bank about 9.
In some places, 3 feet from the roots of the quicks
are for the breadth of the ditch, in some
4, in some 5, and in some 6; but 6 links are
commonly allowed for ditches between neighbour-
ing estates, and 7 links for ditches adjoining
roads, commons, &c. Where a boarded or post
and rail fence comes in the surveyor's way, coupled
with hedge and ditch, he will often be at a loss to
know the precise boundary of the property--when
this is the case, observe from which side the nails
are driven (it being generally understood that nails
are driven homewards) ; if on the ditch side, the
brow of it will be the boundary, if on the other side,
the fence itself: where a fence changes from one
field to another, correctly mark it on the plan--the
breadth of the hedge and ditch must be shown,
which, as we before observed, is generally taken at
15 links. When plotting a plan, the surveyor should
be careful always to have the North upwards, and
the writing from West to East.
[page 9]
Of the Method of Taking Offsets.
A, c, d, e,f, g, h, being a brook or crooked hedge.

From A measure in a straight direction along the
side of it to B; and in measuring along the line
A B observe when you are opposite any bends or
corners of the hedge, as at i j k, &c., and from thence
measure the perpendicular offsets, i c, j d, &c., with a
tape or offset staff. When these offsets are marked
off from the distances on the line A B, a line drawn
through their extremities will represent the crooked
hedge A c d, &c.
To Survey a single Field with the Chain only.
Having carefully read the general observations,
and the method of taking offsets, directions will now
be given for surveying a single field with the chain
alone. As before observed, in a chain survey you
are confined to one figure, a triangle; and the
correctness of every part depends on the extreme
accuracy with which its relative parts are measured,
as well as the judgment displayed in the arranging
or laying out the sides of this figure on the ground,
which should always, as near as possible, be an
[page 10]
equilateral triangle; for if the angle at the apex be
either very obtuse or acute the most trivial error in
the admeasurement of any one of the sides will
materially alter the figure, and consequently the
area. As it is better to proceed gradually, we will
commence with a single field, as the same system is
pursued throughout, whether it be a small enclosure
or a large estate. The first operation is in the
arranging the ground to be surveyed, either into
one or more triangles: that is to say, you station
yourself at one corner of the field, and having
erected a conspicuous mark at your starting point,
look to the opposite corner, and if no natural mark,
as a tree, house, or any other object, exist in the line
you intend measuring, you must erect one; having'
done which, commence chaining from the first
mark in the direction of the second, always ob-
serving that you measure in a perfectly straight
line. Leave marks on this diagonal or principal
line for the purpose of measuring tye or check
lines to the apex of the triangles, to ensure the
accurate measurement of the sides. Note in your
field-book at what distance from your station or
starting point you put down these marks, or false
stations as they are termed. When you arrive at
the opposite corner of the field, put down another
mark, and from this station commence measuring
a line by the Side of one of the fences, without
regard to the angle it makes with the preceding
line, taking offsets to all the bends in the hedge
[page 11]
as you proceed; put down a mark at the end of this
line, as before, and commence measuring a new one
to the station first started from, also taking offsets as
you go along.
Now measure the tye line from the apex of the
triangle or junction of the side lines to one of the
previous marks left on the diagonal, which will
ensure the accurate measurement of the sides. The
same operation will be repeated on the other side of
the diagonal, when the survey of the field will be
complete.

The preceding sketch shows at once the method
of procedure in surveying a single field: A B
being the diagonal or base line, E D the false
stations, left when measuring the diagonal; B C one
side of the triangle, commenced from the termina-
tion of the diagonal, and C A the remaining side of
triangle, which finishes the figure; having arrived
at the point from whence we set out. We have
now to measure the line C D, which verifies the
measurement of the triangle A C B. The same
method of procedure is adopted on the other side of
[page 12]
the line A B, respectively measuring the sides B F
and F A, and the tye line F E; or one false station
may be left on the diagonal, and the continuous
dotted line F C measured. The next operation is
to lay down these lines on paper; to do which, fix
on a scale to which it is intended plotting the field,
as one, two, or three chains to an inch, according
to circumstances. This determined on, draw the
line A B in any position, and measure off the length
with the scale, being careful to mark the position of
the false stations E and D; then take the length
B C with a pair of compasses (beam compasses are
the best) and describe an arc of a circle from B as
a centre; also take the length A C in the same
manner, and describe an arc from A as a centre:
the intersection of these arcs will fix the relative
positions of the lines A C and B C, through which
point draw them from A and B. The same method
of procedure would be observed on the other side of
the diagonal in laying down the lines A F and B F.
Then apply the scale to D, and observe what it
measures to the point C; also from E to F. If
these distances are the same as measured in the
field, it shows that the measurements were correctly
taken; if not, it shows that an error must have been
committed, either in laying off the lines on the plot,
or measuring them in the field; in which case it
must be gone over again until it proves satisfactory.
[page 13]
To Survey the same Field, without a Diagonal,
by means of Chain Angles.
This method is not at all advisable, although
practised to a considerable extent; there is a little
time saved, but the chances of error are con-
siderably multiplied. Commence, as previously
directed, at one corner of the field; but instead of
measuring to the opposite corner, go down the
longest side, and within 200 links, or some con-
venient number, of the end of the line leave a
mark. Now commence a new line, as before
observed, without regard to the angle it makes
with the preceding; and at the same distance
on the new line from the station or point at the
end of the last line leave a similar mark. Now
measure the distance between these two marks,
noting exactly the measurement, even to half a link;
or continue the line to the end of the fence, and
measure it afterwards. The same method may be
pursued at the other angles of the field, although
not absolutely necessary.
The following diagram will illustrate the pre-
ceding method of surveying a field and the manner
of plotting it: --Commence at the angle A, and
measure down one side of the fence towards B, and
at 200 links, or some convenient number, before
arriving at B, leave a mark, a; when arrived at B
[page 14]
commence a new line, B C, and at the exact dis-
tance from B, as you had previously left the mark a,
put down the mark b, and accurately measure the
line a b. Then continue the line to C, where it

would be advisable to pursue the same method,
although it is not absolutely necessary beyond being
a check on the work.
We think we have now sufficiently shown the
method pursued in surveying an enclosure without
a diagonal; and will proceed to plot these lines.
First: draw the line A B in any position, and with
the scale to which it is intended to plot the en-
closure, accurately mark off the distance from A to
B; then take the distance from B to a, or B to b,
which is the same, with a pair of compasses, from
a much larger scale, the larger the better, and from
B, as a centre, describe the arc a b; then with the
compasses take the distance a b, and put one foot in
a, (observing also to take this distance from the
large scale) and with the other make a fine puncture
in b, or describe an arc cutting that point, then
with a fine pointed pencil draw in the line B - C,
passing through the point b. Mark off the distance
[page 15]
B C from the same scale A B was marked from;
then take the distance C D with a pair of compasses,
and from C, as a centre, describe an arc, passing
through D; also take the distance A D, and describe
another arc, cutting the former one in the point D;
then, with a fine pointed pencil, draw the lines
C D and A P to the point of intersection: the
figure will then be complete, or you may take an-
other chain angle at C, or any one of the three
remaining angles, similar to the one at B; which
would be advisable; for the following reason
In measuring the diagonal a b at the angle B, an
error may have been committed in reading the
chain; if so, you have no means of detecting it:
but if a chain angle is also measured at C you
will have a check on the work, as the points P and
A being fixed by the chain angles the measured
distance P A will not at all come in if an error
has been committed, but will either fall short or
beyond those points.
The Method of Surveying a Field with a
Theodolite or Sextant.
Commence on the longest side of the field, and
measure quite round it, as in the preceding example,
taking offsets at all bends in the fence as before.
In the diagram (see last example) commence at A,
and measure to B, leaving a mark at the point A,
whence you started. When arrived at B, with the
[page 16]
instrument look along the line B A, and also to a
mark at C; read off on the instrument the angle
formed by the line B C with the line B A, and
carefully note it in your field-book, measure the
line B C, leaving a mark at B. When arrived
at C, observe the angle formed by the line C P
with C B; measure C D, and when arrived at P
observe the angle formed by P A with P C. This
will finish the figure; and when the last angle
C P A is protracted it will pass through the
point A, whence you started, and the measurement
of the line P A will be the same on the paper as
measured in the field, if the angles and measure-
ments have been correctly taken.--For the method
of observing with the theodolite and sextant, and
plotting the lines, see the directions given under
those heads.
To Survey a Road with the Chain only.
Suppose A B C D to be a piece of road re-
quiring to be surveyed, commence at A, and if no

[page 17]
[C]
natural mark exists in the line A B, set up one,
observing to get the longest possible sight along the
line of road, and taking offsets to all bends in the
fences on each side; likewise to all houses and
buildings, and note where a fence runs up from the
road, as at 1, 2, 3, and so on. Before arriving at
B set down a mark, as at C, otherwise continue the
line 50 or 100 links, as may be convenient, beyond
B to a; then commence a new line from B towards
C, and at b, the exact distance from B as you had
previously set down a, leave another mark, and accu-
rately measure the distance, a b; then continue the
line towards C, pursuing the same method at C and
each subsequent bend in the road. In plotting the
road the same method would he pursued as directed
for plotting a field surveyed without a diagonal.
The above method would not have much pretensions
to accuracy; the angles A B C, B C D, &c., should
be determined with a theodolite, or sextant.
To Survey a Coppice of Wood with the Chain only.
Let A, B, C, D, represent a coppice of wood,
very much overrun with brushwood, so that it cannot
be measured through. In that case take an angle
with the chain by measuring 100 links from A to e,
keeping in a line with A D, and put in a mark at e;
then measure 100 links from A to f, in a line with
A B, and measure the distance from f to e; then
[page 18]

measure, on the outside of the wood, from A to B,
and continue the line beyond B to g, which is 100
links: also measure out 100 links to h, in the line
B C, and measure h g. Now measure B C, C D,
and D A.
To plot the work draw a line at pleasure, to
represent the line e A D, then put one foot of the
compasses in A, and sweep an arch from e to f, after
having taken off 100 links from a large scale. Then
take off the distance, e f, from the same large scale,
put one foot of the compasses in e, and bisect the line
at f; then lay a straight edge on the point of inter-
section at f and the angle of the wood at A, and
draw the line A B, and lay off the distance A B,
with any scale you like to plot your work with,
which may be much smaller than the scale used for
laying down the angle. Then take the distance
from A to D, which lay off upon the line from
A to D by the same scale you used from A to B.
If the angle is taken at B, which should be done, the
[page 19]
[C2]
same process is repeated in laying off the angle as
at A; if not, take the distance B C, put one foot of
the compasses in B, and describe an arch at C, then
take the distance from D to C, put one foot of the
compasses in D and bisect the arc at C, which will
give the exact shape of the wood. Of course the
necessary offsets must be taken, as each line is
measured. By taking the angle at B a check is ob-
tained on the work, as it fixes the point C, and if
that point is laid down in any other position than
the right one, the line C D will not come in, but
will be too short or too long, thereby proving that
an error has been committed.
To take any Inaccessible Distance with the Chain,
as the Width of a River, &c.
Suppose in the annexed sketch you brought
your survey up to the river, the width of which

[page 20]
was necessary for you to know:--let D A be your
base, or some line well connected with your survey,
bring it down to the river edge at A, at which leave
a mark, also set up a mark in a line with D A at
E, then measure out any distance, as A B, at which
set up another mark; then retire back to C, and set
up a mark in a line with B and the object on the
opposite side of the river, at E: measure B C, and
also C P; the distance, D A, you had previously
obtained. If you have set out the line D C parallel
with A B you may easily calculate the distance
A E, in the following manner:--say, as the difference
between A B and D C is to D A, so is A B to A E
the distance required.
If you wish to lay these lines on paper so as to
show the method pursued in crossing the river, it
will be necessary to measure either of the diagonals
A C or D B, which will divide the figure into two
triangles; plot these triangles by intersection, as
before directed, then produce D A and C B, until
they intersect at E, apply your scale to A E, and it
will give you the width of the river.
To Measure over a Steep Hill with the Chain, so as
to reduce it to Horizontal Measurement.
The method adopted in measuring over a hill
to reduce the line to horizontal measurement, is by
taking short lengths of the chain. lithe hill is not
[page 21]
very steep, take half a chain's length, or if very steep,
take 25 links, or less. The foremost chainman in
ascending a hill holds the chain quite to the ground,
while the hindmost chainman takes 50 links, or as
much as the ground will permit him, and holds it
up over the mark, and as near level as he can guess.
In descending, the reverse will be the case, the hind-
most chainman holding to the ground, and the
forward man elevating the chain until he thinks it
level, and then dropping his pin.
Many surveyors who adopt this method in
crossing hilly ground have a plumb line, which the
man elevating the chain holds in his hand. By
this means you can tell exactly, when ascending, if
the chain is over your mark, and, in descending,
where to put in a pin. This method may be
successfully practised where the ground is at a
moderate inclination, but when very steep the ver-
tical angles should be taken with a theodolite, and
the requisite allowance made.--(See description of
the Theodolite.)
Example in Surveying, with different Methods of
Keeping the Field-book.
To survey the annexed three fields the same
method should be observed, whether an instrument
was used or the chain only. You will commence at
A (see Plate 5 where you must set up a mark, that
[page 22]
being the extreme boundary, and measure a straight
line to some object at B, which is the longest line
that could be obtained through the property, leav-
ing marks, which are termed false stations, at a
and b. You must then go off with a line to D,
leaving a false station at c. When you arrive at
about D you will be able to see the mark you first
set up at A, to which you must measure a line from
the termination of the last at D, leaving another
false station at d. You will then have enclosed all
the property on one side of your base. You must
now commence again from A, and measure a line
to some object at C. When you come to about e
you must put down the mark e in a line with the
two false stations at b and c; when you arrive at C
you will be able to see your mark at B, up to which
you must measure. This will finish your great
figure, enclosing all the property. You have now
to fill in the detail, to do which measure e, b, c,
which is a straight line, cutting the base at b; when
you arrive at f, which is in a line with the two
false stations at a and d, you must put down a
mark, f; you must also note exactly the distance
from e to b, and continue on the chainage to c.
Then measure f, a, d, correctly noting the chainage
when you arrive at each false station. These in-
ternal lines, it is evident, will form a check on the
accuracy of the triangles A B D, and A C B.
Of the field-books we need only to refer to them,
and leave the reader to make his choice. The field-
[page 23]
sketch we prefer, as being less liable to error, and all
the minutiæ of the survey being sketched in at the
time, so as greatly to assist the memory in plotting.
It may be thought by many persons, that the sketch
field-book is only applicable to the survey of a few
fields, but with a little practice it may be used in
surveys of any extent. In the common method of
keeping a field-book, it is absolutely necessary to
plot the work as it proceeds, which is advisable in
all cases, but in the sketch field-book it may remain
for months or years, and then be plotted with as
much facility as at first. The Author has a sketch
field-book of an intricate district of some thousand
acres, comprehending one of the suburban villages,
which was non plotted for some months after being
surveyed, but was then done with the greatest ease
and expedition.
If an instrument had been used in the above
survey, the angles A B D, B D A, would have been
taken; also D A C, or B A C, and A C B. The
angles formed by the internal lines need not be
taken, as their positions would be correctly deter-
mined by the outer lines. But without an instru-
ment, if an error of 20 or 30 links was committed
in measuring the line A C it would not be detected,
the point C being determined by intersection, except.
by measuring a line from the apex of the triangle at
C to some part of the base, and the same on the
other side; or a line should be measured from
C to D, (see Parish Surveying) which would occupy
[page 24]
considerable more time than taking the requisite;
angles, neither would it be so correct. The same
liability to error and uncertainty of detection would
exist in the measurement of the other lines: but
where an instrument is used to determine the posi-
tion of the several lines, and every line measured
and tied to the base, it is impossible but the whole
must be correct.
EXAMPLE IN RAILWAY SURVEYING,
Showing in what manner the Survey for the Rail-
way was performed, and an Explanation of the
Field-book.
The base-line A B C was first carefully measured,
of which the portion, A B, is only given in the field-
book. At the commencement of the base, at station
A, was set up a flag, natural mark being visible at
C, in a line with the intended base. Before arriving
at the first fence a false station was put down a, and
the exact chainage (540) was entered in the field-
book, and also at the crossing of the fence; farther
on another false station b (1,330), was put down, the
crossing of the fence being noted as before; and in
a similar manner were put down the other false
stations c (2,240), d (3,380), e (4,080), and, lastly,
that at B (4,720).
[page 25]
Many surveyors, after measuring out a certain
length of base, as A B, would commence at B, and
work back to A, but as that method would perhaps
perplex the beginner, it will be better to return to A
to commence. The first thing to be done is to take
the angle formed by the line A f with the base; but
you must take care to choose your mark at f, so
that you can produce or back your line to g, so as
to form one straight line g A f, then put down a
false station at g, from which commence your chain-
age to f, taking the necessary offsets, and accurately
noting the distance g A, at the crossing of your base;
when you arrive at the top of the field you must fix
your station at f in such a position as to get the
most favourable and longest line, by the side of the
next fence or fences, as f, h, i, j; enter the false sta-
tion at f in your book (580), and continue the line
beyond f, until it cuts the fence; which it does at
600. Then take the angle formed by the line f h i j
with the line you have just measured f a g, which is
108° 10', and measure the distance: on arriving at h
(480), put yourself in the best position for passing a
line down the adjoining fence, as h a l k, take the
angle formed by this line with your object at j,
which is 96°, measure this line, which cuts your base,
at a, the exact chainage of which you must notice
(it is 240), and proceed on towards k; at l you
must put down a false station, which will presently
be of service to form the line l m n, to take up the
adjoining fences. From k you will measure a line
[page 26]
to g, which will finish the first field. It will be at once
seen that there is no occasion to take the angle h k g,
as the two points, k and g, being correctly fixed by
the former angles and measurement: the measured
distance, k g, will not at all come in if the slightest
error has been committed. Now return to h, and
continue the line on towards j; when you come to i
(1,220), take another angle j i m (83° 50'), cutting
the base at b, measure this line, noting the chainage
at b (220), and continue it on to m (615); at which
leave a mark. Return to i, and continue the line on
towards j, until you can fix your false station, as at j,
to command the line j a, cutting the base at c.
Now you may either measure the angle formed
by the line j n, off the line j f, or you may proceed
to c, and take it off the base,--which would, perhaps,
be advisable; then from c (2,200 on the base), take
the angle A c j (79° 40'), extend the line a conve-
nient distance to o, so as to command the line o p q,
and measure from o to n, noting the chainage at j
and c; when you come to n you will find yourself
in a line with m and l, the two stations you had
previously left. Measure n, m, l, noting the chain-
age very exactly at m and l. Now return to o, take
the angle n o q (83° 18'), and measure the line o p q,
leaving a mark at p (1,135), proceed on to q (2,535),
and at q take the angle o q a (88° 15'), measure
q s, noting the chainage, cutting the base at B:
leave a mark at r (675), so as to form a line r e t,
and proceed on to s (1,000).
[page 27]
If it had been thought necessary to give the
field-book farther than this road, a false station
would have been left at s, and the work carried on
to x on the base, the line s q being extended to y;
the angle s y z would be taken, and a false station
made at z; the angle y z x would be also taken,
and the line z x extended to u, so as to form a station
in the line u s v, the angle being taken also at u.
But to return to s; take the angle B s v (87° 20'),
and measure s v; but when you arrive near the end
of the line you must fix your false station v, so as to
range with the others previously put down at d and p,
measure v p, and about w you may or may not leave
a mark; enter the chainage (445), cutting your base
at d, put down a false station at t, in a line with
e r, and continue it on to p (915), which is close.
You may now return to e, and measure a line e a,
which will cut the line v p somewhere about w, and
continue the line on to n (1,815), which is also close.
Return to t, and measure t e r, which will finish the
survey up to the road. The other part, on to C,
would be continued in the same manner; the lines
measured in the field being marked on the plan.
When the student becomes conversant with the
above method much of the labour would be abridged,
as he would run his lines backwards and forwards,
in several instances, without walking to a distant
point to resume his work. Neither is it absolutely
necessary that so many angles should be taken, as
those at h, i, and c, might have been omitted, the
[page 28]
line f j being fixed by the angle taken at f. But the
advantage of taking these angles is very great, as it
ensures the accuracy of the work; as, for instance:
suppose in fixing the false station at i, you made
an error of 10 or 20 links in reading the chain, by
taking the angle at i this would be immediately
detected, otherwise the distance i b, would appear to
plot correctly; for the false station i, being moved
forward or backward 10 or 20 links, would not make
a sensible difference in the length i b: this error in
the distance i b, would therefore not be detected, but
on producing it to m the error would be great.--
(See the Plan.)
Suppose the false station at i moved forwards
20 links to the black line, the distance i b would
appear to be correct, and the line produced through
b to * would be also assumed as correct, in conse-
quence of the measurement, i b, answering to the
position of i on the plan, on reference to which it
will be seen how much the position of m would be
altered: it is true the line m l would correct this,
but suppose the error of 20 links to be committed at
h, the station at l would then be as much in error as
that at m, and the line m l would plot correctly as
to length; but it would be said the measured
distance, k g, would ensure the accurate position of
k, but in the general method of surveying; the dis-
tance, k g, would be necessary to fix the point g,
which would consequently be as much out of its
proper position as the other stations, therefore k g
[page 29]
would plot correctly, and the whole survey be twisted
out of its proper position.
We do not mean to assert that a person making
the above survey without an instrument would lay
out his lines in the same manner; therefore the
inference drawn of an error committed at i, extend-
ing back to g, may by many persons be set down
as erroneous; but, although the same distribution
of lines would not be observed, the consequences
pointed out would ensue wherever an error was
committed, which, if of small amount, it would be
almost impossible to detect.
The field-book is a sketch made as the work
progressed; the several lines being entered as they
were measured, and the offsets in the order they
were taken. The same method is observed, as in
the common system, by commencing at the bottom
and writing upwards.
This survey was made with a sextant--if the
angles had been taken with a theodolite, the first
thing determined would have been the angle formed
by the base line with the magnetic meridian (for the
method of doing which see directions for observing
with the theodolite) which it is always desirable to
ascertain, as your theodolite being set to this read-
ing at any subsequent station on your base will point
out its direction; also when arrived at the end of
your base, if of any considerable extent, it would be
desirable to bisect the beck station, and note the
bearing, the difference would be exactly 180° if you
[page 30]
have measured in a straight line; it also often
happens when surveying near a town, that you are
compelled to take up a long line of road running
out from your survey with many bends in it, your
bearing will here be of service, as probably you will
not be able to connect the extremity of this road
with any other part of your survey than that you
started from, the position of every part of the road
(which is generally of importance) depending on the
accuracy of your angles. In this case there are
various ways of checking the work, but the most
simple and generally practised, where you are
pretty certain of the correctness of your angles,
is to note the bearing of your last line, and when
plotting to lay off this bearing, and with a parallel
rule bring it down to the bearing taken on your
base, with which it should exactly correspond.
It will also be found of great advantage in
measuring a base line to have its bearing, otherwise
(except in a very open country) it will be almost
impossible to measure it straight, without first
ranging it out with poles, as in passing through
a plantation or orchard you are pretty certain to
lose sight of your marks, you have then nothing
but your bearing to satisfy you that you are in the
right line.--For further directions in measuring a
base, and in general surveying, see observations on
parish surveying.
[page 31]
Of Parish Surveying
Previous to appending any remarks or instruc-
tion of our own on parish surveying, we think it right
to direct attention to the following extracts on ties
subject from Captain Dawson's invaluable Report
to the Tithe Commissioners: it is necessary, he
observes, to determine the area of the whole parish
by some means, which make the correctness of that
area independent of the result obtained by summing
up the contents of each enclosure, minute errors in
many of which would escape observation, if not
checked by comparison, with the correctly ascer-
tained whole, It is essential, in fact, to arrive at the
total area of the pariah by direct admeasurement
of the apace included within its external boundary;
and the simplest and cheapest means by which a
survey and plan may be made for effecting this
object appear to me to be as follows:--
1st. To measure two straight lines through the
entire length and breadth of the parish.
2nd. To connect the ends of those lines by
means of other measured lines: and
3rd. From those connecting lines (by measured
triangles and offsets) to determine the entire pariah
boundary.
The true area of the parish may then be ob-
tained by calculation from the measured distances,
[page 32]
and by the admeasurement of the included space
upon the plan.
Lines of the description herein proposed to be
measured are ordinarily used by surveyors in the
construction of their plan, but are not always shown
on the finished map; I propose to retain them per-
manently for purposes which will presently appear.
The object and application of these lines will
be better seen by reference to the diagram beneath,
which is a rough sketch of a parish to be surveyed.

The two main lines which I should recommend
to be measured through it are marked A B and
C D; A C, C B, B D, D A are the connecting
lines, a a a, are the offsets, or perpendicular
[page 33]
[D]
distances of the several angular points of the parish
boundary from the measured lines.
Now, if the main lines A B and C D be mea-
sured accurately, and their true lengths from the
point (O), at which they cross one another, be laid
down upon the plan, it will be seen that the connect-
ing lines A C, C B, &c. will form an efficient check
on the general direction of the two main lines with
reference to one another. A satisfactory check on
the lengths of the several lines will, by the same
meant be afforded; for as the points A, C, B, D, are
in each case determined by the intersections of three
lines, an error in any one of these lines must im-
mediately be discovered.
Thus the true relative position of four extreme
points (A, C, B, D), in the parish boundary will be
obtained, and such portions of the boundary as fall
within the ordinary range of offset-distances from
the connecting lines (A C, C B, &c.) will also be
determined, and may be laid down in their true
positions.
The more remote parts of the parish boundary
may be determined by means of the triangles
(T, T, T), the sides of which (E F, G H, K I, &c.)
being prolonged on the ground to intersect the
main lines A B, C D (as they do at M, N, P, &c.),
may be laid down correctly in position and direction
upon the plan. By this simple process the whole
boundary will be determined, and the total area
may then be ascertained.
[page 34]
Among the objects to be particularly attended
to in practice, is that of reducing the lines, mea-
sured over steep slopes in hilly districts, to the
horizontal plane.
This demands especial mention, because anise
inattention to it is not unusual, though the necessity
for such reduction is well known to practised sur-
veyors, and all should be alive to the importance of
using a theodolite, spirit-level, or other assured
means, in the measurement of lines over hilly
ground, for determining the exact allowance to
be made. Without this reduction of the lines
they cannot be laid down in plan upon a flat
surface, and distortion of the outline must inevitably
result.
Care, of course, most be taken in all cases to
measure the lines straight to the points desired;
sad this will require more particular care in a
mountainous, rocky, marshy, wooded, or thickly
inhabited country. The expedients in use among
practical surveyors will of course be resorted to for
overcoming any difficulties which may attend the
measurement of these main lines, and the theodolite
offers a never failing resource in all cases where a
departure from the direct line is inevitable.
[page 35]
[D2]
Observations
The lines which have been described as essen-
tial to be surveyed, should, in all cases, be marked
upon the plans. They should he drawn in red ink,
in order to distinguish them from, and prevent
their interfering with the lines of fences, &c. and
the length of each line in links should be marked
in red figures upon it. Lines measured in the
direction of external objects, should be drawn out
to the margin of the plan, and the name of the
external object should be written upon the line
thus:-

[page 36]
The main lines should be selected, as much as
possible, with reference to permanent well-defined
objects, such as churches, &c. In other cases it
will be desirable that the extremities of the lines (or
of some of them at least) should be marked, and
preserved on the ground by stones or posts, or by
trees, planted there so as to admit of the points
being referred to at a future time.
The parish boundary should be shown, in all
cases, by a dotted line; and when it passes along
the middle of a fence, the dots should be drawn on
both sides of the fence, thus:-

When a road forms part of the boundary of a
parish, both fences of the road should be shown;
and it will be desirable also to mark the abutments
of other fences upon the outer fence of the road.
The same remark will apply to rivers generally; and
in Lincolnshire and other fen districts, to droves
and the drains by which they are bounded, &c.
When a parish boundary passes through a field
or other enclosure, without being defined by a fence,
the whole of such field or enclosure should be shown
on the plan, with the parish boundary, marked by
a dotted line, passing through it. The area of the
included portion only of such field or inclosure will
appear in the schedule; but the area of the excluded
[page 37]
portion may with propriety be given on the plan,
and be marked as belonging to the adjoining
parish.
In all cases of fences, the actual boundary line
of the adjacent properties should be marked upon
the plan, whether it be the central line or the side
of a hedge, ditch, wall, bank, &c.; and when the
fence belongs entirely to one property or the other,
that should be indicated by the proper mark.
The plans are to be drawn to the scale of three
chains to one inch, to admit of the correct com-
putation of the contents of the several lands. And
the ordinary usage should be observed with regard
to placing the north towards the top of the plan;
writing the name of the parish, as a title, with that
of the county in which it is situated, and adding
the name and address of the surveyor, the date of
performance, the scale, and the total contents.
The extracts we have made from Captain
Dawson's Report are so much to the point, as ne-
cessarily greatly to abridge our remarks, which will
be confined simply to the guiding and directing
persons in the measurement of such lines as are
therein recommended. In the first place, then, we
will endeavour to point out the best and most
correct method of measuring the principal base
through the entire length of the parish. Previously
to commencing or arranging the work, the surveyor
should, if possible, procure an old map of the parish,
which, however incorrect it may be, will still serve
[page 38]
generally to point out the best parts of the parish
through which to pass his lines: but whether this is
obtained or not, let him be in no hurry to lay out the
work, but look carefully to the consequences result-
ing from transverse lines running through various
parts of the parish--whether their extremities can
be easily connected, and if they intersect any par-
ticular or important points within, or are on, with
any without the parish. This is particularly to be
attended to, as it would greatly facilitate the tracing
of the boundary at any future time.
We will suppose, then, the surveyor to have
decided on the point of commencement and direc-
tion of the base, which, if possible, should be on,
with some conspicuous permanent mark, without
the bounds of the parish, as a church, windmill,
house, or such like. At this point set up your
theodolite, and ascertain very exactly the angle
formed by this line with the magnetic meridian;
then take angles to several conspicuous objects
around, which would serve hereafter very accu-
rately to determine the point. At this spot erect a
pole, very perpendicular, and commence the mea-
surement of the line; but before proceeding further,
it cannot be too strongly enforced on the surveyor's
mind the absolute necessity of extreme exactness in
this part of the operation; for which purpose a
much longer chain is recommended than that
usually adopted.--(See remarks on the chain.)
At about every 5 or 10 chains, it would be
[page 39]
advisable to drive a stake firmly into the ground,
with the chainage inscribed thereon in Roman cha-
racters: thus, if at every ten chains, call the first
ten 1, at twenty it would be 2; or if left at every
five chains, at five it would be 1, at ten it would be
2, and so on. The reason of this will be presently
apparent.
The roads, rivers, brooks, fences, &c. as they
are crossed, should be very carefully noted; but in
this stage of the proceedings it would be quite
useless putting down false stations at nearly all the
fences, as in common surveying. Offsets, if within
distance, should be taken to all conspicuous objects.
At certain prominent points, as you pass along, set
up poles; these will serve to keep you in a direct
line, even if you entirely lose your forward object.
Your forward chainman must at each chains length
plumb back to those poles you have erected, and by
keeping them exactly in a line, you need not fear of
departing from your true course.
If you come upon a house, or gentleman's
pleasure ground, through which it is impossible to
measure a line (but this always should be avoided,
if possible:) the means of overcoming the difficulty
will be found by referring to a chapter on the sub-
ject, in the section devoted to levelling; but the
most ready and correct method would be, very
carefully to measure an angle with the theodolite,
either to the right or left of your line, of exactly
60°, and measure out any length until clear of the
[page 40]
obstruction; then take another angle of exactly 60°,
and measure the same distance as the last line.
This will bring you to the exact spot you would
have arrived at, could you have continued your line
onward without interruption. You will thus have
measured two sides and angles of an equilateral
triangle. The remaining angle and side will be
the same; that is, the angle will be 60°, and the dis-
tance, if it could be measured through the obstruc-
tion, would be exactly the same as that of either of
the measured sides; or a line forming any angle
with the base (but which must be determined)
being measured clear of the obstruction, and an
angle taken at the extremity so as to cut the base
beyond the obstruction, the length of this side and
of that passing though the obstruction may be
easily calculated by plane trigonometry. This
difficulty overcome, and the continuous distance
entered in your book we will proceed onward; but
the poles you have set up behind are not visible,
neither probably is your forward mark. To extri-
cute yourself front this dilemma, measure the sup-
plementary angle of 120° from the last measured
side of the equilateral triangle; this will direct you
in the precise line; but to verify it, ascertain its
bearing, which should be the same as at first: and
in this manner you will be able to overcome all
similar obstructions.
We will now suppose the surveyor arrived at
She extremity of his base, where he must set up his
[page 41]
theodolite, and take the angle of one of the side
lines, which should not be very oblique, but as near
45° as circumstances will permit, and, as directed
for the base, should, if possible, be in a line with
some natural mark. To measure this angle, which
is most important, with the requisite degree of
accuracy, it should be repeated several times, and a
mean taken as the correct angle. Set up a pole at
the extremity of the base, and measure this line in
a similar manner as directed for the base, putting
down stakes at intervals. When arrived at the
boundary of the parish, or so far as may be desira-
ble, set up the theodolite and measure an angle
from the last line to some object on the opposite side
of the parish, transversely, to your base, and another
angle to the first station at the commencement of
the base line: set up a pole at the exact spot from
whence the angles were taken, and measure the
transverse line, which can be measured in a per-
fectly straight line, by adopting the Same means as
already directed. When this line is measured up
to the crossing of the principal base, stop, and, from
one of the stakes previously left, measure up to the
exact spot at which you cross, and enter the two
distances in the field-book. Continue the mea-
surement of the transverse base (driving in stakes at
regular intervals as before), to the extremity of the
parish, or so far beyond it, as by tye-lines, measured
to the extremities of the principal base, the entire
parish can be circumscribed; or leaving out such
[page 42]
small portions only, as may be determined by small
triangles from these principal lines, similar to those
marked T, T, T, in the diagram.
In throwing out triangles to enclose any part
of the parish that may be without these aide lines, if
an instrument be used, there will be no occasion to
extend them back to the base, without the figure
should be very large, or the internal lines can be
used for other purposes, than merely to verify the
position of the figure; but where a chain only is
used, it is indispensable to the correct fixing of
the figure that those lines should be so extended
to one of the bases. From the extremity of the
transverse base very accurately observe the angles
of the tye-lines to the extremities of the principal
base, and measure these tye-lines in the same
accurate manner as the bases, leaving stakes at
intervals, and taking offsets to the parish boundary
and conspicuous objects wherever within distance.
When these angles and tye-line are measured and
protracted, there will be four principal stations in
the parish very accurately determined; and by
these stations being correctly fixed, each stake on
the lines connecting the stations, may be consi-
dered as a correctly determined station, and used as
such.
It would be advisable, before filling in any por-
tion of the work, to get the boundary of the parish,
and all the work laying outside the lines; but if not
all the boundary, at least the part on that side from
[page 43]
whence it is intended to commence filling in. In-
ternal lines may now be used wherever it is thought
necessary, the surveyor confining himself to one
portion of the surrey only, and entirely filling it up
before any other part is commenced; his work will
then never get confused. With regard to the
direction of such lines as it may be necessary to
measure within the principal ones, circumstances
must alone direct; but lines may be measured in
any direction within this boundary, without regard
to poles or false stations that may have been erected
during the measurement of the base or tye-lines;
for, having stakes at regular intervals of 5 or 10
chains, the distance from any one of them to the
point at which an internal line crosses can be mea-
sured, and the point determined as correctly as if
that spot had been fixed on for a station, when
measuring these principal lines; and thus can lines
be measured in any direction, always observing
that from one point to another must be perfectly
straight. The angles of the first few internal lines
should be very carefully taken, which will fix their
position without regard to their measurements; and
on the scale being applied thereto, the distance at
which any one of them bisects either of the
principal lines will be the same as measured
in the field, and the point bisected will be at the
same chainage as determined by reference to one
of the stakes. If on protraction of the angle it
should not pass exactly through the point as deter-
[page 44]
mined by measurement, it should be made to do so;
more dependence having to be placed on the dis-
tances than the angle in this case; but by taking the
angle, any error committed in putting down or mea-
suring from any one of the stakes will be imme-
diately detected: points thus determined must be
correct.
If the surveyor is expert in the use of the
sextant, it would be very desirable to have the
angles taken of all the lines, except where well tied;
but where only determined by their extremities, the
angle should in every case be taken. Particular
care is necessary in reducing lines measured over
steep ground to the horizontal plane; for the method
of doing which see description and use of theodolite,
also the method of correction with the chain only.
The surveyor is advised to lay down his work as he
proceeds, if done every day it would be best; he
will then, in the event of committing an error be
able immediately to rectify it. The sextant may be
used with advantage in filling in, but on no account
should any other instrument than the sextant and
theodolite be employed.
With regard to computing the aggregate quan-
tity of land in the parish, the principal measured
lines, as suggested by Captain Dawson, may be used
for that purpose, equalizing and arranging into tri-
angles what may be without; and for the separate
enclosures within they may be equalized and arranged
in a similar manner. But it would appear to us
[page 45]
the most correct method to form parallelograms, or
squares, as usually done in large surveys, of about
2 chains, by which the quantities in each enclosure
would be very correctly ascertained; and for the
aggregate, every fifth or tenth parallelogram might
be distinguished by a thicker line; the aggregate
could then be easily calculated, there being so many
parallelograms of 10 or 20 chains square, or as
much larger as pleased; the broken parts of the
parallelograms would be calculated as directed in
another part of this volume. By this method the
contents of all the enclosures added together, and
the computed whole would be found (if carefully
done) to be so nearly the same, that the difference
would be beneath notice.
The contents of the whole, computed by the
measured lines, might be used as a check on the
preceding method. The lines forming the parallelo-
grams should be permanent; either in faint red or
blue; but probably blue would be the best, so as to
be distinguished from the measured lines, which
Captain Dawson desires to have retained. All the
entire squares must be numbered consecutively, and
the broken figures (as where a fence crosses), calcu-
lated separately; and it will be evident that, in this
separate calculation, the ascertained contents must
be correct; for, having the contents of the whole
square, its parts added together must of course be.
the same.
[page 46]
On Subterranean Surveying, with Directions for
Procedure in Surveying Coal Pits, Mines, &c.
The instrument usually employed in all subter-
ranean surveys is the circumferenter, or a modified
instrument, which is half circumferenter, half theo-
dolite, having the large compass of the farmer, with
the limb and vernier of the latter; by which means
the bearing can be obtained with much greater
accuracy than with the common circumferenter.
The method of procedure is to plant your instru-
ment where the survey is intended to commence,
and take the bearing to a lighted candle placed at
as great a distance in the required direction as can
be seen; the distance must then be measured; to do
which, remove the instrument, and let a person
stand on the exact spot where it stood, holding in
his hand one end of the chain, while another person
takes the other end with a lighted candle in the
same hand, being directed by the former until that
hand which holds the candle and the chain is in a
direct line with the light whose bearing was taken;
there mark the first chain, to which mark the hind-
most man comes, the other advancing another chain
forward as before; this is repeated until the dis-
tance of the light to which the bearing was taken is
determined. The instrument is now fixed where
the light stood as an object, or at the termination of
[page 47]
the preceding bearing and distance, and a second
bearing taken, and the distance measured as before:
this is repeated until the whole is completed.
As surveys of pits or mines are generally made
for the purpose of ascertaining if the workings ex-
tend into adjoining property, or for sinking shafts,
either for ventilation, or convenience for mining the
produce--it is essential, in either case, to mark on
the surface the extent of the workings, or the exact
spot at which the shaft is to be sunk, so as to open
on a precise spot in the pit previously determined
on; or it is often the case, that you may have to di-
rect the miner as to the bearing and distance from
the extremity of some working to another pit: in
either case it is essential to trace the survey on the
surface, to do which, plant the instrument as near
the pit as convenience will allow, so that when the
foresight is put in the direction of the first bearing
you may, by looking backwards, cut exactly the
centre of the pit; if it does not do so, the instrument
is not placed in a proper position, which must be
obtained by shifting the instrument to the right or
left, until it is in the situation beforementioned; after
this is found, measure out the distance of the first
bearing from the centre of the pit, remove the in-
strument to the end of the line, and take the various
bearings, and measure the distances, the same as
below; or, instead of the above manner, choose any
spot near the pit, as the point of commencement,
and from this point take the first bearing and dis-
[page 48]
tance as to the pit. Before the instrument is removed,
take the bearing and distance of the centre of the
pit; then remove the instrument to the end of the
measured distance of the first bearing, and set the in-
struments to the same bearing as the centre of the pit
had; likewise, measure off the same distance as was
the centre of the pit, from the spot commenced on;
then a line from the centre of the pit to this spot will
be the proper bearing and distance.
It will be frequently found necessary, where
only particular points are to be determined so the
surface, to reduce the intermediate bearings and dis-
tances into one bearing and distance; the most easy
and practicable method of doing whish, into apply a
good protracter to the meridian line, with its centre
no the angular point--accurately noting the angle
subtended, and measure the distance with the scale
by which the survey was plotted; during the time
of making the survey, care should be taken not to
admit any iron within three or four feet of the in-
strument, for fear of attracting the needle, although
a large mass of iron will attract it at a much greater
distance. The tram plates or rails generally laid
down in pits do not seem to attract the needle, if
elevated from two to three feet above them; but we
have ourselves found the needle very sensibly affected
by a large clasp-knife in our breast packet. As
these surveys from records which are being continu-
ally referred to from time to time, and additions
made thereto, it is necessary to lay down the work
[page 49]
[E]
in such a manner, that additions at any future time
can be correctly attached: this can only be done by
referring all the angles to the true meridian, as it
must be well known to the most common informed
that the magnetic meridian has been continually, and
is at present varying--the present variation of the
needle is about 27° westward of North; the method
adopted by practical miners for ascertaining the
variation (for it is not the same in all places), is,
to erect a pole exactly perpendicular--its shadow at
12 o'clock will be due North and South, or in the
direction of the true meridian; besides the above
variation of the needle from the true meridian it has
a diurnal variation, which has been often observed to
amount to one degree and a half, which may account
for inaccuracies that have occurred where the greatest
care has been observed in the use of the instrument.
A different method of using the circumferenter,
from what we have just now described, is sometimes
adopted: it is to plant the instrument at alternate
angles, and take back and foresights; thus, in place
of setting up the instrument at the commencement
of the survey, it is done at the extremity of the first
line, and its bearing taken, but with the instrument
reversed, that is, you apply your eye to the opposite
sight vane to that when a forward bearing is taken:
it should be noticed in this case, that the angle is
read off from the South end of the needle, which
angle is easily reversed and laid off, as if taken from
the North end--the forward bearings are taken in
[page 50]
the - usual manner. A back observation is taken
thus, S. 10° 30' West; reversed, it is N. 10° 30' East;
by this method the instrument is setup only half the
number of times, as by the former. We would,
however, recommend the theodolite in this as in all
other kinds of surveying: in the commencement it
would be necessary to determine the bearing, but in
the remainder of the survey, it may be used in pre-
cisely the same manner as already described for
common land surveying: the bearing might also
be noted at each station, which would be an effectual
check on the correctness of the angles.
ON THE PROTRACTING AND PLOTTING OF SUR-
VEYS; THE REDUCING AND COMPUTING OF
AREAS, &c.
It is usual with practical surveyors to plot their
work daily, which, if possible, should always be
done; otherwise, if left alone for a few days, and an
error should have been committed in the first day's
work, it will be very troublesome to correct, besides
a great loss of time: but by plotting daily, any
mistake that may have occurred can be easily
rectified. There is also another advantage in so
doing, which is, that you are enabled to lay down
your work with the most scrupulous exactness, every
part being fresh in your memory; and in all sur-
veys there are particular parts which can only be laid
[page 51]
[E2]
down on the plan from memory. If it should be
inconvenient to plot daily, your lines of construc-
tion should certainly be laid down; the method of
doing which, where a chain only is used, is pointed
out in the commencement of this treatise; and
where an instrument is used, and the angles taken
from the meridian, directions will be found in the
description and use of the circumferenter.
The method of laying down a survey made
with a theodolite or sextant, will, therefore, only be
given here; to do which, with any degree of ac-
curacy, a circular metallic protracter is indispensable.
This instrument, for the general purposes of survey-
ing, should be of about 5 or 6 inches diameter,
divided on silver in a similar manner to a theodolite,
with two projecting arms carrying verniers, and a
third by which the other two are moved round the
circle, either with a rack and pinion, or clamp and
tangent-screws; but where great accuracy is re-
quired, the latter is preferable. The projecting
arms carrying the verniers have each a branch, with
a fine pricker at its extremity. The inner part of
the circle is chamfered off at each quadrant to an
edge, and the divisions brought down to it. A
small circular space of metal in the centre of the
instrument is removed, and a circular disc of glass
inserted in its place, on which are drawn lines cross-
ing each other at right angles, and dividing the
small circle into four quadrants, the intersection of
the lines denoting the centre of the protracter.
[page 52]
When this instrument is used for laying down
an angle, it must be so placed on the paper,
that its centre exactly coincides with, or covers,
the angular point, which may easily be done,
as the paper can be seen through the glass cen-
tre-piece. The divisions at 360° and 180°, which
are brought down on the internal chamfered edge,
must be on the line passing through the exact spot
over which is the centre of the instrument. When
the protracter is thus placed, it is prevented from
moving by four small studs, which take sufficient
hold of the paper without damaging it; then, by
means of the rack and pinion, or clamp and tan-
gent-screws, the vernier may be set to the required
angle. A slight downward pressure on the ex-
tremities of the branches will make two small
punctures in the paper, a line passing through one
of them, and the angular point or centre will be the
required angle. The use of the second vernier is,
that often in setting the instrument to the required
angle, the protracter is stirred, and its centre is no
longer over the angular point. When such is the
case, a line drawn from their punctures will not
pass through the centre: the branches will also
sometimes get deranged, and the same consequences
ensue. To correct this, the branches must be al-
tered by means of two small screws, on which they
play, until a line will pass through the three points:
this should be attended to before the instrument is
used in laying down the angles. When the angles
[page 53]
on a survey are taken with a sextant, they are often
laid down with a semicircular protracter, without a
vernier; which may be also used with advantage
when plotting a survey made with a. theodolite,
except for the principal angles, which must be laid
down with the greatest possible accuracy. It should
also be an invariable custom with a surveyor to
protract all his lines before commencing to plot the
fences, &c., as it often happens on closing a day's
work, that the last line will not protract, which
arises either from some slight error in laying down
the previous angles or distances, or in noting them
in the field: if this is the case, and the early part
of the day's work should be plotted, it is so much.
waste of time.
ON THE REDUCING OF FIGURES AND EQUALIZING
OF BOUNDARIES.
To Reduce a Parallelogram to a Triangle of
equal Area.
Suppose the parallelogram A B C D, is to be
reduced to a triangle, whose area will be the same.

Produce or extend one of the sides, suppose A B,
then lay a parallel ruler on the diagonal D B, and
[page 54]
move it parallel to C; draw in the line C E, or mark
where it cuts the produced line at E; draw in D E,
and it is done: it will be the same thing if you
prick off the distance A B, on the produced line,
which will reach to E.
To Reduce a Trapezium to a Triangle of equal area.
Let A B C D be the trapezium. Draw the
diagonal A C, and extend the base from A to E;
draw B E parallel to A C; from C draw C E,
and the triangle E C D will be equal to the trape-
zium A B C D, which may be proved by scaling
the figures.

To Reduce a Figure of Five Sides to a Triangle.
Let A B C D E be the given figure; extend
the base each way; draw C A, and C E, and B G,
and D F, parallel thereto. C F G will be the re-
quired triangle.

[page 55]
To Reduce or Equalize an Irregular Side or
Boundary to a Mean Line.
Suppose the side of a field to be of the irre-
gular form below. Draw the line A B, and at A

draw a transverse line, which is usually at right
angles thereto, except when the equalizing line of
the adjoining fence passes through that point. Lay
a parallel ruler from A to the third point at c; slide
the ruler up to b, and draw in the dotted line to the
transverse line, or, without drawing it, mark where
it cuts it; from which point lay the ruler to d, slide
it down to c, and draw in the dotted line as before;
from the point at which it cuts the transverse line
lay the ruler to e, and slide it up to d, and draw in
the dotted line from d; lay the ruler from the point
bisection to f, and slide it down to e, draw in this
line, and, from the point of bisection, lay the ruler
to B, slide it up to f, draw in the dotted line; and
from the point of bisection at C, draw the line C B,
[page 56]
which will equalize the irregular boundary, as much
being cut off as taken in.
This method is rarely adopted in practice; too
much time being taken up in the operation, and
equally as accurate results being arrived at by a
much shorter process, which is to equalize those
irregular boundaries by the eye, and by a little
practice it may be done with the greatest exactness.
A thin piece of transparent horn, or a strip of glass,
is recommended for this purpose, by which means
you can very exactly judge if you include as much
new space as you exclude of the original; or a bow
of whalebone, or any elastic substance, strung with
horse-hair, will suit as well. But the method gene-
rally adopted is to draw an equalizing line, in pencil,
with a parallel ruler or straight-edge, which, on
being removed, if the line is found to exclude a
greater portion of the original than it includes of
new space, is rubbed out, and fresh lines drawn,
until the eye judges it correct.
[page 57]
ON THE METHOD OF COMPUTING
AREAS.
In computing ,the contents of any piece of land,
whether it be one enclosure or a great number, it is
done quite independent of the several lines mea-
sured in the field, except in some cases where the
base line and a few others, from their position on
the plan, may be used with advantage; otherwise
new lines are drawn, dividing each separate enclo-
sure into trapeziums and triangles, the bases and
perpendiculars of which are measured on the plan
by means of the scale from which it was plotted,
and so multiplied, and added together for the total
contents. After all the separate quantities are thus
computed, and added together in one sum, calculate
the whole estate, independent of the fields, by dividing
it into large triangles and trapeziums, and |